Twin Peaks: Recused judge’s lawyer offends client and attorney gagged by order

Double domeDallas – McLennan County’s criminal justice community is not trying to “scheme against” defendants in the Twin Peaks shooting, said a lawyer appointed to represent a judge recused in the case.

A supplemental pleading to the 10th District Court of Appeals cites those remarks as evidence a gag order is unconstitutional and unworkable, according to the lawyer who filed the court papers.

Mr. (Matthew) Clendennen and his counsel are subject to the gag order entered by the Judge of the 54th District Court, Matt Johnson, and cannot publicly speak to this matter of grave public concern to our justice system. Nevertheless, the agent for Judge Peterson is permitted to give statements to the press at will,” wrote F. Clinton Broden, his attorney.

Waco attorney David Deaconson said in a news story about the search for Peterson’s replacement following his recusal in an examining trial to discover probable cause in Clendennen’s case that there is a belief that “the county is totally trying to scheme against these people” is unfounded and that “examining trials are not needed unless defendants are in jail and seeking another way out.”

On the contrary, Broden wrote, Clendennen is seeking an examining trial so that “an innocent person can be promptly cleared of criminal charges wholly lacking in individual probable cause.”

Judge Peterson charged the 177 defendants arrested on a “fill-in-the-blank” affidavit of warrantless arrest in which only the person’s name differered from any of the others. The only allegations of probable cause are that the person so charged is a member of a “motorcycle gang” and was wearing distinctive “colors” identified by the Department of Public Safety as those of an outlaw gang. Clendennen is a member of the Scimitars, a Cossacks support club that is not listed in the DPS manual published at Texas A&M University.

He declared that “this is yet another example of why the gag order in this case is unworkable and one that has arisen since the filing of the Original Petition” because “McLennan County judges (Judge Strother and Judge Peterson through his agent) are not bound by the gag order entered by Judge Johnson and continue to make statements to the media.”

Clendennen is “denied free speech rights to address why he is seeking an examining trial despite the fact that he is not ‘in jail and seeking another way out.’”

At the time when the first shot rang out at the Twin Peaks Restaurant on May 17, Clendennen ran from the patio area and hid inside the building during a bloody melee that left 9 dead, 20 wounded, and is one of 177 persons charged with the identical offense of engaging in organized criminal activity that led to capital murder and/or aggravated assault.

A first degree felony, the offense is punishable by a possible minimum of 5 years imprisonment or a maximum of a life term upon conviction.

For the reasons set forth in the Petition and for the foregoing reasons, Mr. Clendennen submits that Judge Johnson’s gag order is unconstitutional and unworkable and that the Writ of Mandamus should be issued.”

9 thoughts on “Twin Peaks: Recused judge’s lawyer offends client and attorney gagged by order”

  1. First off I want to say awesome blog! I had a quick question in which I’d like to ask if
    you do not mind. I was interested to find out how you center yourself and
    clear your mind prior to writing. I’ve had a tough time clearing my thoughts in getting my thoughts out.

    I do take pleasure in writing but it just seems like the first 10 to 15 minutes tend to be lost simply just trying to
    figure out how to begin. Any recommendations or tips?

    1. It’s a good question. Start by thinking of the mass of information you have is shaped like a pyramid. Try to determine what active voice, positive and declarative statement would best describe the broadest plane of reality represented by the facts. Lay it down from the top, deleting any unnecessary words and find a place to put that period as quickly as possible. Start the next paragraph. As you work, you will often think of other statements that are more representative of what you wish to convey. Don’t be afraid to try them out as the lede (sic).

      Check out the difference between these two sentences: At a monthly meeting of the Upper Butt Crack Valley Board of Public Library Directors held last Tuesday evening at 7 pm, it was decided that in the future all who keep books borrowed from the library past their due date must pay overdue fines within 10 days, or face misdemeanor prosecution in Municipal Court.

      Try this out for for size: Law and order came to the Valley of the Upper Butt Crack on Tuesday. Those who fail to pay late fees on books borrowed from the library within 10 days will face a municipal court summons, the Board of Directors decided. The judge may impose a fine of $25 for misapplication of public property, in addition to daily fines of one nickel.

  2. Just want to say your article is as astonishing. The clarity in your publish is just spectacular and
    that i could suppose you’re an expert in this subject. Fine together with your permission let me to grasp your feed to keep updated with forthcoming
    post. Thank you one million and please continue the enjoyable work.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

+ three = 10